Skip to content

Home Topics Email Security Management Attachment and link security

Email Security Management · Attachment and link security

Email attachment and link security examples: what good and bad look like

Short answer

A good email attachment and link security implementation follows these steps: Block executable and macro-enabled attachment types at the gateway; Enable URL rewriting with time-of-click reputation checks. A bad one typically allow-listing partner domains and bypassing scanning entirely.

Attachment and link security covers scanning files and URLs in inbound mail (sandboxing, detonation, URL rewriting and time-of-click checks) and safe handling policies for outbound content.

What good looks like#

  • Done: Block executable and macro-enabled attachment types at the gateway.
  • Done: Enable URL rewriting with time-of-click reputation checks.
  • Done: Sandbox unknown attachments before delivery.
  • Done: For outbound, prefer links to authenticated portals over attachments for sensitive files.

What bad looks like#

  • Seen in audits: Allow-listing partner domains and bypassing scanning entirely.
  • Seen in audits: Password-protected archives that evade scanning.

How to move from bad to good#

Work through the good list in order and re-verify after each change. Most teams find one or two items from the bad list already present; fixing those usually produces the largest improvement.

Frequently asked questions#

Are PDF attachments safe?

Mostly, but PDFs can carry scripts and phishing links. Sandboxing and link rewriting still apply.

Keep reading on Attachment and link security